Pakistani court sends notices to government ministries against proposed PIA privatization

 

Pakistani court sends notices to government ministries against proposed PIA privatization

The Sindh High Court (SHC) took action on Tuesday by issuing notices to various government ministries, including law, aviation, and finance, in response to a petition challenging the proposed privatization of the Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (PIAC).

The two-judge bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, also summoned the deputy attorney general to appear on December 21 and instructed the concerned parties to submit their responses before the next hearing.

 

Committee established to expedite privatization of Pakistan International Airlines (PIA)



The petitioner, Samira Mahamadi, a regular litigant, named secretaries of the three ministries and the executive director of Ernest & Young, the firm reportedly selected as the financial adviser for the privatization, as respondents. Mahamadi urged the SHC to declare the proposed privatization as ultra vires to the Constitution, arguing that major policy decisions should only be made by an elected government. She further requested the court to declare all actions taken by the caretaker setup for the privatization of PIAC null and void, emphasizing the lack of lawful authority.

The SHC bench acknowledged the petitioner's claims filed in the public interest, expressing concerns about the privatization process initiated by the caretaker government. Mahamadi contended that the caretaker government lacked the authority to make decisions regarding the privatization of PIAC, citing Section 230 of the Election Act, 2017. The bench noted the petitioner's argument that the PIAC Act, 2023, exempted certain provisions of the Elections Act in the case of caretaker government actions related to existing agreements and projects.

 

World Bank consults with Pakistani government on PIA privatization strategy



Additionally, the petitioner challenged the validity of the amendment in Section 3(3) of the PIAC (Conversion) Act, 2016, asserting that it was made in violation of company law and was intended to facilitate PIAC's privatization. The bench deemed these contentions worthy of consideration and issued pre-admission notices to the respondents and the Deputy Attorney General, directing them to submit replies by December 21, 2023, for further evaluation.

Source: Dawn

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post